Book a Consultation
RSLA

What is the difference between Section 23 and Section 24 applications under Ontario’s Repair and Storage Liens Act (RSLA)?

Section 23 and Section 24 of the RSLA both deal with liens on vehicles or equipment, but they apply at different stages and serve different purposes.

Under Ontario’s Repair and Storage Liens Act:

Section 23 — Determination of rights by the court
This is used when there is a question about any party’s rights under the Act — for example, whether a lien is valid, how much the lien is worth, whether a lien holder has registered a non-possessory lien, or how proceeds from a sale should be distributed. Any person affected by those questions can bring a Section 23 application.

Section 24 — Return of article when dispute
This is specifically for situations where the lien claimant holds possession of the article and refuses to surrender it, and the owner (or someone lawfully entitled) disputes the lien or its amount or quality of repair, etc. Under Section 24, the disputing party pays the claimed amount (or security) into court, obtains an initial certificate, which forces release of the article unless there is an objection, then a final certificate, and ultimately the lien shifts to the money in court, rather than hanging over the article itself.

In short: Section 24 is the mechanism to get your article back when there is a dispute. Section 23 is the broader tool to have the court determine rights, amounts, or purposes under the lien law.

Contact us to discuss the right strategy for your case.

Back to all FAQs

More on RSLA

Have a Specific Matter?

Every file is different. Book a consultation and we'll give you practical guidance on yours.

Book a Consultation

Legal Disclaimer

Copyright © 2026 Precision Paralegal Services Professional Corporation (ON) & Precision Paralegal Services Inc. (AB & BC). All rights reserved.

The information on this site is not legal advice, and you should not rely upon it as such. If you have a legal question, you should always consult with a paralegal or lawyer. Even if you use this site or consult with us, remember that we are not retained to represent you and no paralegal-agent-client relationship exists unless and until you receive written confirmation from us.

Please note that the items discussed during a consultation will remain confidential and will not be discussed with unauthorized persons, unless required by the Law Society of Ontario or other governing body. A consultation, either in person or by telephone, does not create a paralegal-agent-client relationship with the Paralegal or Precision Paralegal Services. Precision Paralegal Services does not make any obligation to handle the matter until such time that a written agreement is duly signed by both the Paralegal and the Client.

You should note that the security of e-mail is uncertain. By sending confidential e-mail messages or by using our online contact forms (which are not encrypted) you accept the risks of such uncertainty and possible lack of confidentiality over the Internet.

BC Innovation Sandbox

Precision Paralegal Services team member Michelle Haigh has been accepted into the Law Society of British Columbia Innovation Sandbox. Our services to you are not provided by a lawyer regulated by the Law Society of British Columbia and as a result:

  • (a) We could be required to disclose to third parties your communication with us and any documents you provide in relation to our advice and assistance, as such communications will not be subject to solicitor-client privilege.
  • (b) We carry professional liability insurance but are not required to do so.
  • (c) There is no statutory complaint process in relation to the services that we provide, but we have an internal complaint process.
  • (d) The Law Society of British Columbia has not evaluated or verified our competence, character, and/or fitness to provide the services.

For more information about the Law Society's innovation sandbox visit lawsociety.bc.ca.

To view our Privacy Policy please click here.